SDV Insights

Utah Applies Workers Compensation Exclusive Remedy Protection to Wrap-Up General Contractors


Workers’ Compensation is considered a quid pro quo between employer and employee. The worker enjoys compensation benefits for work related injuries (regardless of who is at fault for such injuries) in exchange for surrendering the right to sue the employer for damages (with certain exceptions). This limitation is known as the “exclusive remedy” rule.

Traditionally the rule pertained to employees and their direct employers and/or to “principal employers” that paid workers compensation benefits when the direct employer failed to pay. However, courts in a number of jurisdictions expanded the exclusive remedy rule to apply to upstream parties (construction project owners and/or general contractors) that procure workers compensation insurance for the employees of downstream parties (such as subcontractors) as part of a consolidated insurance program, a/k/a “wrap-up” insurance. Other jurisdictions have rejected this expansion.

The Supreme Court of Utah in Nichols v. Jacobsen Constr. Co., 2016 UT 19 (Utah 2016) recently joined those jurisdictions which extended the exclusive remedy protection, finding that a project general contractor acquiring workers’ compensation coverage under a wrap-up was immune from a negligence claim brought by a subcontractor’s injured employee.

We conclude that Jacobsen qualifies as an eligible employer and has met the specific requirements of the statute. First, Jacobsen procured the work of Mr. Nichols’ subcontractor Safway by entering into an agreement to erect and dismantle scaffolding for the City Creek project. Second, Jacobsen satisfied the statutory requirements for securing the payment of workers’ compensation benefits by enrolling Safway in the CCIP [wrap-up policy].”

 

Click on this link to view the article in pdf format






CONTACT US

The email you are sending does not create an attorney-client relationship with SDV. We do not agree to representation until we have performed a check for conflicts of interest and expressly agree to provide services in a particular matter via an engagement letter. The information submitted to us via this website will NOT be treated as confidential or privileged as a lawyer/client communication and our receipt of this information does not prevent us from representing a client related to the subject of your inquiry.

Northeast

35 Nutmeg Drive
Trumbull, CT 06611

203.287.2100

Southeast

851 5th Avenue N
Naples, FL 34102

239.316.7244

West Coast

Two BetterWorld Circle
Temecula, CA 92590

951.365.3145


SDV is based in Connecticut, conveniently located between New York City and Boston, with regional offices in Florida and California to better serve our clients. We're ready to answer your questions and eager to assist you in developing solutions.